Chornancap Revista Jurídica promotes the responsible, ethical, and critical use of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Therefore, it establishes the following guidelines for authors who use AI tools to adhere to.

Definition of AI

For the purposes of this journal, artificial intelligence (AI) is considered to be any technology, algorithmic system, software, or machine (e.g., ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, or other similar systems) that performs simulated human cognitive functions, such as text generation, reasoning, machine learning, automatic suggestion, content synthesis, among others.

Author's statement on the use of AI

The use of AI should be limited to auxiliary tools and should not replace the author's intellectual content.

Any use of AI in a manuscript must be clearly stated in an explicit section (note, footnote, or methodological section), indicating at least:

1. Name of the tool and version used.
2. Purpose or scope of use (e.g., language assistance, style correction, summary generation).
3. Section(s) of the manuscript in which it was used.
4. Subsequent human intervention: editing, rewriting, critical review.

It is not permitted to present content generated wholly or partially by AI that has not been supervised and critically reviewed by the human author as your own.

Responsibility, accuracy, and originality

Authors are fully responsible for the content, even when they have used AI as a support.

Any part generated by AI must be verified, reviewed, and corrected against reliable sources.

The use of AI to produce fictitious data, manipulate results, automatically generate conclusions without human intervention, assign authorship to AI, or make substantial alterations without human supervision is prohibited.

AI in the editorial process

The journal may use AI only for auxiliary or technical functions (e.g., automated similarity checking, linguistic analysis, metadata suggestions, or stylistic correction).

Under no circumstances will AI decide on the acceptance/rejection of manuscripts without human review.

Editors will supervise any automatic output and will be responsible for validating or correcting it.

Penalties, retraction, or rejection

If undeclared or inappropriate use of AI is detected, the editorial committee may demand clarification, request corrections, or reject the article.

A published article may also be retracted if misuse of AI is discovered in the future, including in database systems or repositories.

In such cases, a retraction or correction notice may be published in accordance with current editorial standards.

Review and update

These guidelines may be updated as technologies and international standards (Heredia Declaration, COPE) evolve.